The race for Jersey City’s next mayor has narrowed to two familiar names—James Solomon and Jim McGreevey. The December 2 runoff is shaping up to be a referendum on what kind of city Jersey City will be in the next decade.
At the heart of this showdown is a single, high-stakes question. How can a rapidly growing city remain livable and affordable for working families, seniors, and young professionals who want to build their futures here?
Easy booking across hundreds of accommodations from luxury high-rises to unearthed brownstone treasures.
Browse Accommodations Now
Solomon vs. McGreevey: A Runoff Defined by Housing
In November’s election, James Solomon, a sitting Jersey City Councilmember, led the crowded field with 29.2% of the vote. Jim McGreevey, a former New Jersey governor, followed with 25.1%, securing his place in the runoff.
Both men bring starkly different political resumes to the table. But voters will notice that, on the surface, they’re saying many of the same things about development and affordability.
Each candidate has made housing policy the centerpiece of his campaign. Residents already know: rents and property taxes have been climbing faster than paychecks, and the city’s economic boom has left too many people wondering whether they can afford to stay.
Where They Agree on Affordable Housing and Development
Despite their clash in the headlines, Solomon and McGreevey share some key positions. Both support a mandatory 20% affordable housing set-aside in new residential developments—so one in five units in qualifying projects would be reserved at below-market rates.
That’s a significant shift in a city where affordability requirements have often been negotiated project by project. They also agree that tax abatements for developers—basically long-term property tax discounts—need much tougher scrutiny.
For years, these incentives have fueled Jersey City’s building boom, especially along the waterfront. Critics, including many longtime residents, argue that generous tax breaks have enriched developers without delivering enough affordable homes or neighborhood improvements.
Find available hotels and vacation homes instantly. No fees, best rates guaranteed!
Check Availability Now
The Big Divide: Solomon’s $1,000-a-Month Plan
While the two candidates sound similar on the broad strokes, their differences sharpen quickly when you move from slogans to specifics. Nowhere is that more obvious than in Solomon’s proposal to create thousands of new apartments with rents capped at $1,000 per month.
Solomon frames this as a bold, necessary response to what he calls a housing crisis. In a city where one-bedroom apartments can easily push past $3,000, a $1,000 cap evokes a different era—when teachers, firefighters, restaurant workers, and recent graduates could realistically plant roots here.
McGreevey’s Critique: “Unrealistic” and Too Costly
McGreevey has sharply criticized the plan as financially unsound. His campaign warns that the proposal could translate into a $3 billion tax burden on property owners citywide.
He argues that the costs of such a large-scale affordability program would inevitably land on homeowners and small landlords already struggling with rising tax bills. Solomon rejects this characterization, insisting that private developers would shoulder the lion’s share of the construction costs, not taxpayers.
In his view, the city should leverage its power over zoning, density, and public land to demand more from developers accustomed to high profits on luxury towers. There’s no easy answer, and both sides seem pretty dug in.
Real Estate Money and the Question of Influence
The debate over who pays for affordability has spilled over into a broader argument about influence at City Hall. Solomon has accused McGreevey of siding with the real estate industry to avoid “stringent” affordable housing requirements.
He points to the significant campaign donations McGreevey has received from real estate interests as a red flag. Those contributions don’t prove any wrongdoing, but they raise familiar concerns in a city where developers have long played an outsized role in shaping policy.
As of now, neither candidate has put a clear number on how many affordable units they intend to create. Voters are left to decide which candidate they trust to actually deliver when the campaign signs come down.
A Local Flashpoint in a Statewide Affordability Struggle
Jersey City’s mayoral runoff isn’t happening in a vacuum. Housing affordability was a top issue in New Jersey’s recent gubernatorial race as well.
Many suburbs and small cities are wrestling with the same pressures Jersey City faces—just on a smaller scale. Rising demand, stagnant incomes, and limited land have combined to make the cost of living one of the defining stressors of life in this state.
Whoever takes the oath as mayor will need to steer local policy and work with Trenton and neighboring communities on regional solutions. That could mean stronger tenant protections or smarter land use around transit hubs, but nobody’s pretending it’ll be easy.
What This Election Means for Residents, Visitors, and the City’s Future
Housing policies don’t just affect those searching for apartments. They influence neighborhood character, school enrollment, small business viability, and even tourism.
If the next administration gets affordability right, it could stabilize long-term residents and keep the city’s cultural diversity intact while still welcoming newcomers. That balance matters whether you’re choosing a permanent home or just browsing Jersey City hotels for a weekend stay on this side of the Hudson, enjoying the skyline views without Manhattan prices.
Connecting the Ballot Box to Daily Life in Jersey City
If you’re trying to decide where to stay in Jersey City as you move between neighborhoods, or you’re new and exploring the city districts from the Heights to Greenville, this runoff will shape rental markets for years. Families planning their kids’ futures here, and visitors making their way through the list of things to do in Jersey City—from waterfront parks to local restaurants—are all affected by these changes.
Even commuters and out-of-towners should pay attention. If you’re looking into getting to Jersey City for work, tourism, or maybe a move, the city you find in a few years will reflect the choices made on December 2.
Whether you lean toward Solomon’s ambitious affordability push or McGreevey’s caution about costs, this runoff isn’t just about personalities. It’s really about the soul—and, honestly, the affordability—of Jersey City itself.
Find the perfect hotel or vacation rental. Instant booking, no fees!
View Top Stays
Here is the source article for this story: Where do the candidates for Jersey City mayor disagree most? Housing affordability.
Getting Around Jersey City, NJ
Plan Your Stay in Jersey City, NJ
Things to Do in Jersey City, NJ
