The latest debate in Jersey City is swirling around Ordinance 25-110, a $200 million “rent-to-own” lease agreement that could change Jackson Square for decades. This plan, stretching over 25 to 30 years, would build a new municipal building, add public parks, create decorative plazas, and honor the Jackson brothers—two men who escaped slavery and became landowners in the 1830s.
Supporters call it a bold investment in the city’s future. Critics worry about transparency, financial risk, and how quickly the council got the proposal.
Easy booking across hundreds of accommodations from luxury high-rises to unearthed brownstone treasures.
Browse Accommodations Now
The Vision for Jackson Square
Assistant Business Administrator Gregory J. Corrado says this project is about much more than just the JC EDC Building. City officials see the ordinance as a way to revive Jackson Square, blending new infrastructure with cultural and historical appreciation.
Two new parks would bring much-needed green space to the area. Decorative plazas are supposed to become gathering spots for both residents and visitors.
A Tribute to History
Maybe the most symbolic part of the plan is a statue honoring the Jackson brothers. These men, once enslaved, managed to own land in Jersey City during the 1830s—a huge feat for that era.
Find available hotels and vacation homes instantly. No fees, best rates guaranteed!
Check Availability Now
City leaders want the statue to serve as a lasting tribute to their resilience and their place in local history. It’s a nod to community legacy and empowerment, tying the future of Jackson Square to these values.
Concerns Over the Deal
Lofty goals aside, the ordinance has drawn plenty of criticism. The $200 million “rent-to-own” model feels risky to some residents, especially with the economy being what it is.
People are also frustrated about how the proposal landed in front of the council—at the last minute, with little time for questions, public feedback, or other ideas.
Community Voices
Erica Walker, Chief of Staff to Councilman Frank “Educational” Gilmore, has jumped into the conversation. She represents Ward F and questions whether fast-tracking such a big investment really fits with the Jackson brothers’ legacy.
Critics argue that real empowerment means transparency and shared planning, not rushed decisions made behind closed doors.
Jersey City’s Broader Appeal
As the Jackson Square debate rolls on, it’s clear that big projects like this affect how people experience the city as a whole. The rise of boutique Jersey City hotels and the steady growth of neighborhoods with unique food and culture mean there are more choices for where to stay in Jersey City than ever.
Exploring the City
Visitors drawn to new public spaces will probably check out other things to do in Jersey City, like waterfront parks, lively food scenes, and cultural spots. Better infrastructure in Jackson Square could become another anchor for both locals and tourists.
Connectivity and District Development
Advancing a major civic project ties directly to better access and getting to Jersey City from nearby areas. Stronger transit connections can boost mobility and open up more economic opportunities.
More cohesive city districts might even spark new community engagement. Jersey City’s leaders have to weigh the upsides of growth against the need to keep the city financially stable and make sure residents genuinely feel heard.
Find the perfect hotel or vacation rental. Instant booking, no fees!
View Top Stays
Here is the source article for this story: Op-Ed: Jersey City’s Jackson Square Deal Misses the Spirit of Its Namesakes
Getting Around Jersey City, NJ
Plan Your Stay in Jersey City, NJ
Things to Do in Jersey City, NJ
